Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 FSUPP2D 1267 - Jones v. Buckner

Jones v. Buckner’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681L · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Scheuer v. Rhodes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public records such as those accessed through the [National Crime Information Center] database, and searching Plaintiff's records through any such database does not violate the federal constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Section 1983 plaintiffs may sue individual-capacity defendants only for money damages and official-capacity defendants only for injunctive relief.”); Greenawalt v. Ind. Dep’t of Corrs., 397 F.3d 587, 589 (7th Cir.2005) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.