963 F. Supp. 2d 255 - Biro v. Condé Nast’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) successfully invited public attention to his views in an effort to influence others prior to the incident that is the subject of litigation; (2) voluntarily injected himself into a public controversy related to the subject of the litigation; (3) assumed a position of prominence in the public controversy; and (4) maintained regular and continuing access to the media.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“While neither the Supreme Court nor the Second Circuit has precisely articulated the effect of Iqbal and Twombly on defamation cases, Iqbal itself squarely holds that, where a particular state of mind is a necessary element of a claim, defendant's pleading of that state of mind must be plausible and supported by factual allegations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Kerik v. Tacopina“a plaintiff must ... lay out enough facts from which malice might reasonably be inferred”); Adelson v. Harris, 973 F.Supp.2d 467, 503 (S.D.N.Y.2013) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Kerik v. Tacopina
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.