Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · County of Riverside v. McLaughlin · McClain v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so considered [was] such that reasonable and fair-minded jurors could only find the accused not guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where such discretion has been abused and a substantial right of a party has been affected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dahl v. State“[t]he admissibility of evidence rests within the trial court's discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dahl v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.