Porter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State · 815 So. 2d 1196 - Jackson v. State · 743 So. 2d 326 - Davis v. State · Robertson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“examined the motion under [s]ection 99-39-19, along with the filed answer and any completed discovery, to determine if an evidentiary hearing should be required.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]nce a prima facie case is established, the [circuit] court may still proceed under [s]ection 99-39-19 ... and summarily deny a petitioner's motion if, after the answer has been filed and discovery completed, it appears that no evidentiary hearing is warranted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A court may not use [s]ection 99-39-11 to summarily deny a motion if the supreme court has granted permission to file the motion in the [circuit] courts, pursuant to Section 99-39-27.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.