Putnam v. Epps’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 555 So. 2d 738 - Walker v. State · 783 So. 2d 675 - Edmond v. MISSISSIPPI DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS · 716 So. 2d 636 - Unruh v. Puckett · 877 So. 2d 468 - Putnam v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] petition for habeas corpus is still a viable option in limited circumstances, such as a challenge of the denial of bail pending an appeal, but purely collateral post-conviction remedies attacking a judgment of conviction or sentence should be sought under authority of the Post-Conviction Collateral Relief 'Act since that Act, in the pure post-conviction collateral relief sense, is arguably post-conviction habeas corpus renamed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“repealed post-conviction use of habeas corpus and implemented a motion framework specifically for post-conviction collateral review of challenges to convictions or sentences, as opposed to pre-conviction challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.