Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 SO2D 267 - State v. Richardson

State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · Frye v. United States · 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State · 748 So. 2d 1028 - Stephens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] party seeking postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel must show (1) counsel’s specific acts or omissions were “so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment” and (2) prejudice by “show[ing] that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” ... “The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.