Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

963 So. 2d 285

Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-08-01

Relies on 660 So. 2d 703 - Abreu v. State

Decided 2007-08-01

¶1On Motion fob Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

¶2Pascual Martinez petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari seeking review of an order striking as untimely his motion to mitigate sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). This petition was previously denied by order. We vacate the order denying the petition, grant the motion for rehearing, and issue this opinion.

¶3Within the sixty-day time limit, counsel filed a rule 3.800(c) motion to mitigate petitioner’s sentence seeking a youthful offender sentence to avoid a mandatory ten-year term under the 10-20-Life statute. At the same time, counsel asked the court to grant an extension of time for a hearing on the motion to mitigate. The State did not object to granting the extension. Because the 3.800(c) motion was not delivered to the judge until after the time had expired, the motion was struck as untimely, and the judge did not rule on the request for an extension of time.

¶4We vacate the trial court’s order and remand for the court to rule on petitioner’s request for an extension of time. See Abreu v. State, 660 So.2d 703 (Fla.1995) (holding that, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.050, the court may extend the sixty-day time limit for a motion to mitigate sentence as long as the motion to mitigate is resolved within a reasonable time).

FARMER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/963/so2d/285 · .json · Public domain