Ohrn v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “before entry of a permanent injunction against repeat violence. See Ohrn v. Wright, 963 So.2d 298, 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). In Ohrn , the court explained as follows: To satisfy the constitutional and statutory imperative of due process, at an injunction hearing, the parties must have an opportunity to prove or disprove the allegations made in the complaint. All witnesses should be sworn, each party should be permitted to call witnesses with relevant information, and cross-examination should be permitted. Id. The courts cannot ignore”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Cirillo v. Jones · 968 So. 2d 635 - Tejeda-Soto v. Raimondi

2. “the requirements of fundamental due process[.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 968 So. 2d 635 - Tejeda-Soto v. Raimondi