Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

963 So. 2d 314

Huewitt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 2007

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-08-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2009

1 state decisions

Relies on 882 So. 2d 977 - Moore v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-08-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The record reflects that appellant committed the underlying offense after the October 1,1998 effective date of the Criminal Punishment Code (CPC). The CPC permits a court to sentence a criminal defendant up to the statutory maximum without the need for written reasons or a departure. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704; § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Moore v. State, 882 So.2d 977, 984 (Fla.2004). Thus, appellant could be sentenced up to the statutory maximum for his offense without an “upward departure.”

SHAHOOD, C.J., GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/963/so2d/314 · .json · Public domain