Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 963 SO2D 328 - Rogers v. State

Rogers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Ring v. Arizona · United States v. Cotton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the victim injury which is the basis for the assessment of sentencing points is not an element—or the functional equivalent of an element—of the offense and thus not part of the essential facts constituting the offense charged, the victim injury need not be alleged in the information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “It remains true — and of salient significance for the instant case — that “not all facts affecting the defendant’s punishment are elements,” and therefore that not “every fact with a bearing on sentencing must be found by a jury,” or alleged in the charging instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “plain, concise, and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.