State v. McGee’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · 817 So. 2d 1131 - State v. Robinson · 414 So. 2d 680 - State v. Albert · State v. Johnson · 761 So. 2d 528 - State v. Owunta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“D. Attacking credibility extrinsically. Except as otherwise provided by legislation: (1) Extrinsic evidence to show a witness’ bias, interest, corruption, or defect of capacity is admissible to attack the credibility of the witness. (2) Other extrinsic evidence, including prior inconsistent statements and evidence contradicting the witness’ testimony, is admissible when offered solely to attack the credibility of a witness unless the court determines that the probative value of the evidence on the issue of credibility is substantially outweighed by the risks of undue consumption of time, confusion of the issues, or unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fruge“to admit the fact and has failed distinctly to do so,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.