Thornton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 848 So. 2d 287 - State v. McBride · 801 So. 2d 101 - Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano · U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), establishes that the former wife does not have a property interest in the EORT. The former wife asserts that in Carollo I, this Court determined that the EORT was a marital asset, thereby entitling the former wife to half. We agree with the former wife and affirm. The law of the case mandates that "questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 289 (Fla. 2003) (quoting Fla. Dep't of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So.2d 101, 105 (Fla.2001)); U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould, 437 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1983); Thornton v. State, 963 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Additionally, the law of the case doctrine, may foreclose subsequent consideration of issues”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“implicitly addressed or necessarily considered by the appellate court's decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.