¶1ORDER
¶2Sublessees appeal the judgment entered granting sublessors’ claim for money owed them under a sublease. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *351appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).