Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

963 S.W.2d 475

Hardy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-03-10

Relies on State v. Blankenship

Decided 1998-03-10

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He concedes his motion was filed out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Mo. banc 1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/963/sw2d/475 · .json · Public domain