¶1ORDER
¶2Appellant, Stephen Irvin, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He concedes his motion was filed out of time.
¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).