United States v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
964 F.2d 1186 · 1992
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Occhipinti (1993), United States v. DeJohn (2004)
44 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · United States v. Bailey · United States v. Price · County of Riverside v. McLaughlin · Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested or served with a summons in connection with such charges.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“undisputed rule that a state arrest does not trigger the Speedy Trial Act's clock, even if the arrest is for conduct that is the basis of a subsequent indictment for a federal offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“If, in the case of any individual against whom a complaint is filed . .. , no . . . information is filed within the time limit required by section 3161(b) . . . such charge against that individual contained in such complaint shall be dismissed or otherwise dropped .. . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.