United States v. Imran’s Empirical Analysis
964 F.2d 1313 · 1992
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Yousef (2003), United States v. Locascio (1993)
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952
Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · California v. Brown · New York v. Ferber · Penn v. Parke State Bank · Carter v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“dictate the precise language of a jury instruction.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] district court must exercise 'great caution' in determining whether to grant a retrial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, and may grant the motion only 'in the most extraordinary circumstances.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Among other things, the defendant must show that the new evidence 'would probably lead to an acquittal.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.