Zaken v. Boerer’s Empirical Analysis
964 F.2d 1319 · 1992
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Rioux (1996), Lippay v. Christos (1993)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on United States v. Young · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · Halas v. Department of Energy · DiCarlantonio v. United States · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen such a statement is offered against another corporate employee, instead of the corporation, proper admission under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) will necessarily depend on the nature of the relationship between the declarant and the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lippay v. Christos“directed [the company's] operations and ... made all the final decisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.