Mindek’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Hoxworth, Harris
1 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · Titus v. Mercedes Benz of North America · Clarence Marshall, Jr. v. Allyn R. Sielaff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [T]he extent of the party’s personal responsibility; (2) the prejudice to the adversary caused by the failure to meet scheduling orders and respond to discovery; (3) a history of dilatoriness; (4) whether the conduct of the party or the attorney was willful or in bad faith; (5) the effectiveness of sanctions other than dismissal, which entails an analysis of alternative sanctions; and (6) the meritoriousness of the claim or defense.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the most severe in the spectrum of sanctions provided by statute or rule must be available to the district court in appropriate cases, not merely to penalize those whose conduct may be deemed to warrant such a sanction, but to deter those who might be tempted to such conduct in the absence of such a deterrent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dan H. Hoxworth Louise A. Hoxworth Bradley Gavron Barry Brownstein Richard Donaldson Mary Donaldson Andress Kernick Edward J. Bush, Rose M. Weber Stanley Bernstein Dorothy Bernstein David Reiff Joel Lieberman Jane Scheck Kenneth J. Holtmeyer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. Meyer Blinder John Cox Intercontinental Enterprises, Inc. Bradley Gavron Daniel H. Hoxworth Louise A. Hoxworth Barry Brownstein Richard Donaldson Mary Donaldson Andress Kernick Edward J. Bush Rose M. Weber Stanley Bernstein Dorothy Bernstein David Reiff Joel Lieberman Jane Scheck Kenneth J. Holtmeyer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. Meyer Blinder John Cox Intercontinental Enterprises, Inc. Barry Brownstein Don Townsend Daniel H. Hoxworth Louise A. Hoxworth Bradley Gavron Barry Brownstein Richard Donaldson Mary Donaldson Andress Kernick Edward J. Bush Rose M. Weber Stanley Bernstein Joel Lieberman Jane Scheck Kenneth J. Holtmeyer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. Meyer Blinder Intercontinental Enterprises, Inc. Meyer Blinder and Intercontinental Enterprises, Inc., in No. 92-1108. John Cox, in No. 92-1116 · Hoxworth“[N]ot all of the Poulis factors need be satisfied in order to dismiss a petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.