Corion Corporation v. Chen’s Empirical Analysis
964 F.2d 55 · 1992
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably American Heritage Life Insurance v. Orr (2002), Filanto Spa v. Chilewich International Corp (1993)
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wrenn v. Thornburgh · Neil v. Biggers · University Life Insurance Company of America v. Unimarc Ltd C · Fiore v. Washington County Community Mental Health Center · Zosky v. Boyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“granted defendant's motion to stay proceedings .... [and] directed that the case be 'administratively closed' pending arbitration.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]mmediate appealability of an arbitration order in a lawsuit which seeks no more than an order directing arbitration is the price or consequence of the final judgment rule, for once the order to arbitrate enters, the court has disposed of the entire controversy then before it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“1) a declaration that Chen [the employee] was not entitled to arbitrate the discharge decision (count 1) and 2) a declaration that plaintiff was entitled to discharge Chen (count 2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.