United States v. Tilley’s Empirical Analysis
964 F.2d 66 · 1992
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Parrilla-Tirado (1994), United States v. Clark (1995)
39 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Santobello v. New York · California v. ARC America Corp. · Nicholas v. United States · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“regardless of whatever it may have promised earlier.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) whether the original plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary and in compliance with Rule 11, (2) the strength of the reason for withdrawal, (3) the timing of the motion to withdraw, (4) whether the defendant has a serious claim of actual innocence, (5) whether the parties had reached (or breached) a plea agreement, and (6) whether the government would suffer prejudice if withdrawal is permitted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Jose Amado Nunez was charged in a two count Indictment, with a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2320 (a), intentionally and knowingly traffic or attempt to traffic eight hundred and eighty seven counterfeit tax stamps from the Treasury Department of Puerto Rico, and Section 2314, intentionally, unlawfully and fraudulently transport and cause to transport in foreign commerce from [the] Dominican Republic a falsely made and forged tax stamp of the Treasury Department of Puerto Rico on November 25, 1999. In this case the defendant will plead guilty to COUNT ONE of the Indictment and the United States will request the dismissal of COUNT TWO of the Indictment upon sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.