United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 508 Depot Street’s Empirical Analysis
964 F.2d 814 · 1992
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Solem v. Helm · Ingraham v. Wright · Harmelin v. Michigan · Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once the government meets this burden, 'the burden shifts to the party opposing forfeiture to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is not subject to forfeiture....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'if the constitution allows in rem forfeiture to be visited upon innocent owners ... the constitution hardly requires proportionality review of forfeitures.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'that the government is exacting too high a penalty in relation to the offense committed,’ ” and remanded the cause for the lower courts to”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.