Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 964 F.2d 814 - United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 508 Depot Street

United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 508 Depot Street’s Empirical Analysis

964 F.2d 814 · 1992

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · Ingraham v. Wright · Harmelin v. Michigan · Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the government meets this burden, 'the burden shifts to the party opposing forfeiture to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is not subject to forfeiture....'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'if the constitution allows in rem forfeiture to be visited upon innocent owners ... the constitution hardly requires proportionality review of forfeitures.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'that the government is exacting too high a penalty in relation to the offense committed,’ ” and remanded the cause for the lower courts to”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.