Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 964 F.2d 83 - United States v. Corral

United States v. Corral’s Empirical Analysis

964 F.2d 83 · 1992

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
December 2007
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Labat · United States v. Wells Metal Finishing, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(i) states that [n]otwithstanding ... the provisions of subsection (c) [list of minimum and maximum fines], but subject to subsection (f) [waiver or imposition of lesser fine], the court shall impose an additional fine amount that is at least sufficient to pay the costs to the government of any ... supervised release ordered.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a district court may not impose a duty to pay for the costs of incarceration or supervised release if the defendant is indigent for purposes of a [punitive] fine under Sentencing Guidelines section 5E1.2(a).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he court shall impose a fine in all cases, except where the defendant establishes that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.