Pester Refining Company Pester Refining Company v. Ethyl Corporation Pester Refining Company Pester Refining Company’s Empirical Analysis
964 F.2d 842 · 1992
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Riebesell (2009), Feltman v. Warmus (In Re American Way Service Corp.) (1999)
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno · Stowers v. Mahon · Collingwood Grain, Inc. v. Coast Trading Co. · Iola State Bank v. Bolan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“interest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Riebesell · In Re Haugen“(2) Where the seller discovers that the buyer has received goods on credit while insolvent he may reclaim the goods upon demand made within ten days after the receipt.... 3”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1. The seller sold goods on credit to the debtor in the ordinary course of business of both; 2. The seller delivered the goods to the debtor at a time when the debtor was insolvent as defined by the Bankruptcy Code; 3. Within ten days after the goods were delivered to the debtor, the seller made a written demand for the return of the goods; and 4. The debtor had possession of the goods at the time of the reclamation demand or the goods were not in the hands of a buyer in the ordinary course of a good faith purchase at the time of the demand.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.