Bethea v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anglemyer v. State · Cardwell v. State · Hammons v. State · Wrinkles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a petitioner claims the denial of effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel did not raise issues the petitioner argues should have been raised, reviewing courts should be particularly deferential to counsel’s strategic decision to exclude certain issues in favor of others, unless such a decision was unquestionably unreasonable. But this does not end our analysis. Even if we determine that counsel’s choice of issues was not reasonable, a petitioner must demonstrate a reasonable probability that the outcome of the direct appeal would have been different in order to prevail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Bethea’s arguments concerning Appellate Rule 7(B) review essentially mirror the arguments already addressed.” Bethea, 964 N.E.2d at 269 . We conclude, as did the Court of Appeals, that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.