State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2023
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · State v. Thorne · 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the undisputed facts; (2) the disputed facts; (3) conclusions as to the disputed facts; and (4) conclusion as to whether the statement is admissible and the reasons therefor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Trout“requires the court to focus on `the extent to which a defendant's criminal intent, as objectively viewed, changed from one crime to the next.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morris“means: (a) To take the property... of another....' RCW 9A.56.010(7)(a)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Linehan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.