Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 964 P2D 441 - Wright v. Shorten

Wright v. Shorten’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2022

11 state decisions

401998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Breck v. Ulmer · Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. Stepanoff · Gamble v. Northstore Partnership · Hertz v. Berzanske · Gregor v. Hodges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will not find an abuse of discretion unless we are left with a definite and firm conviction on the whole record that a mistake has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “hold the pleadings of pro se litigants to less stringent standards than those of lawyers,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “provide relief from judgments which, for one reason or another, are unjust.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.