Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 964 SO2D 173 - Brown v. McKinnon

Brown v. McKinnon’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 184 So. 2d 428 - McNayr v. Kelly · Tucker v. Resha · 482 So. 2d 1378 - Harris v. Lewis State Bank · 231 So. 2d 6 - Hauser v. Urchisin · 702 So. 2d 517 - Stephens v. Geoghegan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in order for a plaintiff to succeed in piercing the statutory immunity defense, he must make a good faith allegation in the complaint that the public office official either acted outside the scope of his employment or in bad faith. The statute places an affirmative duty on the plaintiff to satisfy this pleading requirement. This duty cannot be satisfied by mere conclusory allegations. Without support, the complaint must fail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.