964 So. 2d 213 - Beasley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 733 So. 2d 963 - Cottle v. State · 814 So. 2d 402 - Schwab v. State · 851 So. 2d 839 - Rudolf v. State · 766 So. 2d 1095 - Eristma v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[We] reaffirm the requirements that a defendant must allege and prove in order to be entitled to relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel for advising a defendant to reject a plea offer. The defendant must allege and prove that (1) counsel failed to convey a plea offer or misinformed the defendant concerning the possible sentence he faced, (2) the defendant would have accepted the plea but for counsel's failures, and (3) acceptance of the plea would have resulted in a lesser sentence than was ultimately imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lester v. State“First, the defendant must show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness based on prevailing professional norms. Next, [t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lester v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.