Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

964 S.W.2d 465

Whitehead v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-02-17

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2015

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-02-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Mark Whitehead, Movant, appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 29.16 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant filed the motion after his convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action.

¶3We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/964/sw2d/465 · .json · Public domain