Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

964 S.W.2d 890

Robbins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-04-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2000

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant pled guilty to first degree tampering and stealing, in violation of sections 569.080.1(2) and 570.030, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to two concurrent five year terms of imprisonment.

¶3Thereafter, movant filed a Rule 24.035 motion. The motion court conducted a hearing and issued findings of facts and conclusions of law, and denied the motion. Movant appeals.

¶4We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties. The motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The motion court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/964/sw2d/890 · .json · Public domain