Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Robertson v. State · Holden v. State · Winer v. State · 165 Or. App. 442 - State v. Higgins · 222 Or. App. 285 - State v. Hart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not have intended to cause the specific injuries to Officer Smith's fingers which occurred, it is a reasonable inference that the natural and probable consequence of his conduct would be to cause some physical injury to the officer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bradley v. State“harm to the body that results in a reduction in one's ability to use the body or a bodily organ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MUMITT v. State“no evidence that the scratches caused any continuing discomfort or limited his use of his knee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MUMITT v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.