Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 965 F.2d 1118 - Allnet Communication Service, Inc. v. National Exchange Carrier Ass'n

Allnet Communication Service, Inc. v. National Exchange Carrier Ass'n’s Empirical Analysis

965 F.2d 1118 · 1992

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2023
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 14 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc. (2007), Cahnmann v. Sprint Corp. (1998)

28 federal appellate · 14 district ·

3401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Western Pacific Railroad · Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co. · Texas Pacific Railway Company v. Abilene Cotton Oil Company · Far East Conference v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “best suited to make the initial decision on the issues in dispute, even though the district court has subject-matter jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The primary jurisdiction doctrine rests both on a concern for uniform outcomes (which may be defeated if disparate courts resolve regulatory issues inconsistently) and on the advantages of allowing an agency to apply its expert judgment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “says only that injured parties may institute collection suits in district court; it does not prohibit the court from withholding decision until the Commission has spoken on technical or policy questions that would determine the outcome”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.