Shango v. Jurich’s Empirical Analysis
965 F.2d 289 · 1992
Citation profile
72
cited by 72 later decisions
3
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
45 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Turner v. Safley · Carey v. Piphus · Bounds v. Smith · Salve Regina College v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“some quantum of detriment caused by the challenged conduct of state officials resulting in the interruption and/or delay of the plaintiff's pending or contemplated litigation.”
19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prison officials failed 'to assist in the preparation and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law.'”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Library access may be restricted by time, place and manner regulations that are 'justified in light of legitimate security considerations.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.