Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 965 F.2d 311 - No. 91-1617

No. 91-1617’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably United States v. All Assets and Equipment of West Side Building Corp Penny (1995), United States v. Josleyn (2000)

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society · American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp. · Medlin v. Mann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “harbors a latent ambiguity that has split the circuits. Some circuits hold that to avoid forfeiture a claimant must establish both lack of consent and lack of knowledge. Others hold that even if a claimant has actual knowledge, the claimant may avoid forfeiture by establishing lack of consent. See 141st Street Corp., 911 F.2d at 877-878 (collecting cases); United States v. 8848 South Commercial Street, Chicago, Ill., 757 F. Supp. 871, 886 (N.D.Ill.1990) (discussion of various circuits' positions).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Defendant, as the Plaintiffs’ employer, will be responsible or liable for permitting such behavior only if the Plaintiff proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the Plaintiffs supervisor or successively higher authority knew, that is, had actual knowledge [,] or should have known, that is, had constructive knowledge, of the hostile or abusive work environment and permitted it to continue by failing to take remedial action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Liability is based upon the fact that the agent’s position facilitates the consummation of the fraud, in that from the point of view of the third person the transaction seems regular on its face and the agent appears to be acting in the ordinary course of the business confided to him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.