United States v. Kamel’s Empirical Analysis
965 F.2d 484 · 1992
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Kozinski (1994), United States v. DePriest (1993)
55 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Townsend v. Sain · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Morris v. Slappy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To receive a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, the defendant must demonstrate that the evidence (1) came to their knowledge only after trial; (2) could not have been discovered sooner had due diligence been exercised; (3) is material and not merely impeaching or cumulative; and (4) would probably lead to an acquittal in the event of a retrial.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]robably the most frequent basis for a Rule 33 motion--and the only one specifically mentioned in the rule--is one 'based on the ground of newly discovered evidence.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]onfessions given only after the confessor's conviction, and especially when proffered by relatives or friends, are engulfed in an `aura of suspicion and doubt.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.