Schulz v. Serfilco, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
965 F.2d 516 · 1992
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc. · Beraha v. Baxter Health Care Corp. · Pelfresne v. Village of Williams Bay · Maksym v. Loesch · Bell, Boyd & Lloyd v. Tapy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will be deemed to be admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ll material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed to be admitted.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“might have asked the district court for leave to amend, or perhaps supplement [her] response; a motion could have been brought under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to alter the court's order granting summary judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.