Klett v. Pim’s Empirical Analysis
965 F.2d 587 · 1992
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Mills v. Maine (1997), Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (2003)
29 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 7 U.S.C. § 1981A · 7 U.S.C. § 1989
Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Carlson v. Green · Shillitani v. United States · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · United States v. Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As under the Federal Tort Claims Act, liability under the Swine Flu Act depends on the law of the place where the act or omission occurred_ Thus, when a vac-cinee sues the United States for negligently carrying out one of its tasks under the [Swine Flu Vaccination] Program by failing to provide adequate warning to potential vaccinees, state law supplies the applicable standard of care.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The violation of a federal statute or administrative regulation by an agency of the United States does not, standing alone, create a cause of action under the FTCA. See Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14 , 100 S.Ct. 1468 , 64 L.Ed.2d 15 (1980); Younger v. United States, 662 F.2d 580, 582 (9th Cir.1981); Gelley v. Astra Pharmaceutical Prod., Inc., 610 F.2d 558 , 562 (8th Cir.1979). “[FJederally imposed obligations, whether general or specific, are irrelevant to our inquiry under the FTCA, unless state laiv imposes a similar obligation itpon private persons.” Gelley, 610 F.2d at 562; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]ompensatory civil contempt does not survive if the underlying injunction is vacated because it was issued erroneously”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.