965 F. Supp. 3 - Coretti v. Lefkowitz’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2015
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692A (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 47 U.S.C. § 553
Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · Goldman v. Belden · International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Yale Auto Parts, Inc. v. Johnson · Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“obligation ... to pay money arising out of a transaction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“personal, family, or household purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.