965 F. Supp. 87 - Fallacaro v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7608 · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 706 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · General Electric Co. v. Gilbert · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co. · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“without regard to mitigating measures such as medicines, or assistive or prosthetic devices.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determination of whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]n individual who has a back condition that prevents the individual from performing any heavy labor job would be substantially limited in the major, life activity of working because the individual’s impair ment eliminates his or her ability to perform a class of jobs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.