Hadix v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Blum v. Stenson · Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. Agyei · Wright v. Morris · Cooper v. Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“directly and reasonably incurred in proving an actual violation of the plaintiff's rights”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hadix v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.