A criminal judgment entered following denial of a motion to suppress evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Decided 2021-10-28
FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
OCTOBER 28, 2021
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 193
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Randy Scott Jensen, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210098
Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District,
the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tonya Duffy, State’s Attorney, Valley City, ND, for plaintiff and appellee;
submitted on brief.
Scott O. Diamond, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Jensen
No. 20210098
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Randy Scott Jensen appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a
conditional guilty plea to charges of unlawful possession of a controlled
substance, unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, and driving under
suspension. Jensen argues the court erred in denying his motion to suppress
because he did not give officers consent to search his vehicle. We conclude there
was sufficient competent evidence capable of supporting the court’s finding
that Jensen consented to the search of his vehicle. We summarily affirm under
N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
1
