State v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. United States · 450 So. 2d 217 - Holly v. Auld · 633 So. 2d 1061 - Lippman v. State · 427 So. 2d 166 - State v. Dunmann · 864 So. 2d 512 - Woodson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conditions imposed pursuant to this section do not require oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing and shall be considered standard conditions of probation or community control for offenders specified in this section. (1) Effective for probationers or community controllees whose crime was committed on or after October 1, 1995, and who are placed under supervision for violation of chapter 794, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145, the court must impose the following conditions in addition to all other standard and special conditions imposed [[Image here]]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fureman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.