Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 965 SO2D 376 - Chambers v. State

Chambers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 107 So. 2d 16 - Frazier v. State · 386 So. 2d 232 - Brewer v. State · Nelson v. State · 588 So. 2d 221 - Maqueira v. State · 872 So. 2d 1000 - Pantin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e reach the inescapable conclusion that Chambers'[ ] confession which almost immediately ensued from what was essentially a promise not to charge him with a `fictional' murder if he told the truth rendered his recorded statement and confession unconstitutional as coerced and involuntary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.