Kelley v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on R.K. v. J.K. · Bailey v. Bailey · Jundoosing v. Jundoosing · 420 So. 2d 1072 - Mooneyham v. Mooneyham · 757 So. 2d 279 - Sumrall v. Munguia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the court awarded $500 in attorney’s fees to Day, the record reflected that Day provided an attorney billing invoice reflecting amassed attorney’s fees in an amount more than $4,000. We find the award of attorney’s fees reasonable and warranted pursuant to ... section 93-9-45. Therefore, we cannot find that the chancellor erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Day.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.