Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

965 S.W.2d 482

Bibbs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-04-28

Relies on Nicholas v. United States · Hernandez v. United States · Day v. State

Decided 1998-04-28

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Thomas E. Bibbs appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion to vacate the judgment convicting him of two counts of possessing a forging instrumentality (§ 570.100, RSMo 1994) and one count of forgery (§ 570.090, RSMo 1994). The motion court dismissed Bibbs’ 24.035 motion to vacate judgment because Bibbs did not file his motion within the rule’s 90-day deadline. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the deadline. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 866, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989). Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/965/sw2d/482 · .json · Public domain