Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 965 SW2D 817 - Baze v. Commonwealth

Baze v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2016 · most notably Baze v. Rees (2008), Baze v. Parker (2004)

2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

250199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Crane v. Kentucky · Simmons v. South Carolina · Lee v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The inclusion of this additional element required the Commonwealth to prove the absence of extreme emotional disturbance beyond a reasonable doubt in order to obtain a conviction of murder ... and to prove the presence of extreme emotional disturbance beyond a reasonable doubt in order to obtain a conviction of first-degree manslaughter. Theoretically, the jury could have found by a preponderance of evidence, but not beyond a reasonable doubt, that Baze was or was not acting under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance. If so, the jury would have been required to acquit Baze of both charges.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “evidentiary matters should be omitted from the instructions and left to the lawyers to flesh out in closing arguments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.