Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 966 A2D 350 - In Re Bach

In Re Bach’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Addams · ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. Owrutsky · In Re Pierson · In Re Fair · In Re Gil

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hile disbarment may appear “draconian” as applied to respondent's conduct, the Board has not defined for us an exception of principle to Addams' rule that does not risk "simply paying lip service" to it. Disbarment under Addams is not reserved for the "most egregious and dishonest" instances of intentional misappropriation, and the Board’s own recommendation of disbarment effectively admits that respondent’s conduct differed only in degree, not kind, from cases in which the Addams rule has been applied unyieldingly. Bach, supra note 1 , 966 A.2d at 352 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.