United States v. Jessup’s Empirical Analysis
966 F.2d 1354 · 1992
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably United States v. Robertson (1995), United States v. Morrison (1993)
22 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Lane v. Peterson · United States v. Spedalieri · Verdugo v. United States · Evening News Ass'n v. Arber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This circuit has followed the approach of balancing the effect of applying the exclusionary rule at sentencing against the costs of impairing effective and suitable punishment of proven offenders and unduly complicating sentencing procedures.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he district court's determination that illegally obtained information can be considered for sentencing purposes is a legal conclusion requiring this court to apply certain legal principles. Hence, the issue is primarily a legal one for which a de novo standard of review is appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.