Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

966 F.2d 1442

Docket No. 90-7157.

Graham v. Timby

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1992 Decided: June 3, 1992

Relies on Florida Steel Corporation v. New Jersey Steel Corporation Valley Steel Corporation

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-06-03

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-89-400-R)

Ronald Graham, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Edward Meade, Macon, Mcguire, Woods, Battle & Boothe,Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Ronald Graham appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. Timby, No. CA-89-400-R (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/966/f2d/1442 · .json · Public domain